F.S. §316.075(1)(c)1 & §316.074(1)

Red Light Camera Intelligence Map

Explore where enforcement is concentrated in Miami-Dade while understanding the statewide safety and revenue implications of camera-driven ticketing under F.S. 316.075(1)(c)1 and 316.074(1).

0
316.074 + 316.075 Citations
Combined violations in research dataset
0.0%
Camera Share of Citations
48,940 camera vs 26,419 officer
0.0x
Top City Camera Multiplier
Pinecrest camera vs officer citation volume
0.0%
Same-Day Repeat Gaps
Share of consecutive repeat events on same day
316.074 + 316.075 Citations
0
Combined violations in research dataset
Camera Share of Citations
0.0%
48,940 camera vs 26,419 officer
Top City Camera Multiplier
0.0x
Pinecrest camera vs officer citation volume
Same-Day Repeat Gaps
0.0%
Share of consecutive repeat events on same day
Camera Revenue Multiplier
0.0x
$12.17M camera vs $5.53M officer

Interactive Enforcement Map

This map is Miami-Dade scoped and visualizes geocoded citations under F.S. 316.075(1)(c)1 and 316.074(1). Start here, then continue below for deeper trend analysis and concentration breakdowns.

Showing Statutes: F.S. 316.075(1)(c)1 + 316.074(1)Geography: Miami-Dade geocoded citation locationsMore detailed analysis below the map
Search by officer, agency, city, and violation text.
Click any top-agency legend item to isolate that jurisdiction.
Use cluster zoom to move from county patterns to intersection details.

Enforcement at Industrial Scale

These visuals combine statewide findings from 622,681 citations with red-light-specific slices to show how automated enforcement diverges from traditional officer enforcement.

Citation Volume
65%
35%
Camera 48,940
Officer 26,419

Cameras issue about 1.9x the volume of officer tickets.

Fine Revenue (records with amount data)
69%
31%
Camera $12.17M
Officer $5.53M

Automated enforcement generates 2.2x officer revenue.

Concentration Shock

Top 10 municipalities produce 92.4% of camera citations

The top-10 camera municipalities account for 43,641 of 47,242 camera citations. That concentration profile suggests enforcement is highly localized, not evenly distributed across the county network.

Top 10: 92.4%
All other areas

Additional Pattern Findings

Beyond map hotspots, the dataset shows strong concentration effects, pricing differences, and repeat-violation frequency patterns.

Most Extreme City Multiplier
62.7x
Pinecrest camera-to-officer volume ratio
Average Fine Difference
+26%
$257.58 camera average vs $204.47 officer average
Repeat Violation Tempo
14.1 days
Median time between repeat citations

Enforcement concentration remains sharp: Aventura (10,396 camera citations), West Miami (9,243), and Miami Gardens (4,677) lead camera volume, while several municipalities show multi-order differences between automated and officer-issued enforcement.

City Multipliers (Camera vs Officer)

Jurisdictions where automated volume vastly exceeds human enforcement.

Pinecrest62.7x volume
Camera 1,505 vs Officer 24 | Revenue multiplier 77.6x
West Miami44.2x volume
Camera 9,243 vs Officer 209 | Revenue multiplier 59.0x
North Miami Beach40.3x volume
Camera 3,349 vs Officer 83 | Revenue multiplier 44.8x
Opa-Locka27.4x volume
Camera 3,040 vs Officer 111 | Revenue multiplier 30.6x
Aventura25.7x volume
Camera 10,396 vs Officer 405 | Revenue multiplier 40.9x
Sunny Isles Beach13.7x volume
Camera 4,653 vs Officer 340 | Revenue multiplier 18.5x

Municipal Dependency Index

Share of enforcement volume generated by cameras in cities where both camera and officer activity are present.

Pinecrest98% camera share
Camera 1,505 vs Officer 24
West Miami98% camera share
Camera 9,243 vs Officer 209
North Miami Beach98% camera share
Camera 3,349 vs Officer 83
Opa-Locka96% camera share
Camera 3,040 vs Officer 111
Aventura96% camera share
Camera 10,396 vs Officer 405
Sunny Isles Beach93% camera share
Camera 4,653 vs Officer 340
Miami Gardens92% camera share
Camera 4,677 vs Officer 408
Medley84% camera share
Camera 2,384 vs Officer 445
Coral Gables44% camera share
Camera 2,202 vs Officer 2,764

High dependency cities are those where camera share approaches or exceeds 90% of local red-light/tcd enforcement volume.

Repeat Behavior Tempo

Time-gap distribution between consecutive repeat citations shows whether behavior appears episodic or persistent.

Same day60%
1-7 days10.4%
8-30 days12.7%
1-3 months12.4%
3-6 months4.2%
6+ months0.3%
Tempo Summary
  • 60.0% of repeat gaps occur on the same day.
  • 83.1% occur within 30 days.
  • Median repeat interval is 14.1 days.
  • Long-gap repeats (6+ months) are rare at 0.3%.

How to Use This Map

This interactive map provides multiple ways to explore red light camera and traffic signal enforcement patterns in your area.

Search & Filter

Use the search bar to filter citations by officer name, agency, violation type, race, location, or city. Toggle filter chips to narrow your search.

Agency Legend

Click any agency in the right panel legend to filter the map to just that agency's citations. Color-coded markers show which agency issued each ticket.

Cluster Navigation

Click colored clusters to zoom into enforcement hotspots. Click individual markers to see citation details including date, officer, and violation description.

Key Enforcement Insights

Understanding red light camera enforcement patterns can help you stay informed and protect your driving record.

Camera Concentration Clusters

Camera citations are concentrated in specific municipalities and corridors. Density is not uniform across Miami-Dade.

Revenue and Volume Divergence

Camera programs produce higher average fines and large city-level multipliers compared with officer-issued tickets.

Constitutional + Safety Tension

The DeLuca ruling challenges due-process assumptions around owner liability and automated adjudication workflows.

Frequently Asked Questions

What statutes are covered on this map?

This map covers citations issued under F.S. 316.075(1)(c)1 (traffic control signal violations — running a red light) and F.S. 316.074(1) (obedience to traffic control devices). These are the primary statutes used for red light camera enforcement in Florida.

Where does this citation data come from?

All citation data is sourced from public records available through Miami-Dade County. Citations are geocoded based on the location reported on each ticket and mapped to their precise enforcement location.

Didn't a judge just rule red light camera tickets unconstitutional?

Yes. In March 2026, Broward County Judge Steven P. DeLuca ruled that F.S. 316.0083 (which authorizes red light camera enforcement) violates due process by presuming the registered vehicle owner is guilty. The ruling applies to the specific case but opens the door for statewide challenges.

Can I search for a specific intersection or agency?

Yes. Use the search bar on the map to filter by officer name, agency (such as Miami-Dade PD, City of Miami, or Florida Highway Patrol), violation type, location, city, or defendant demographics.

I received a red light camera ticket. Can Ticket Toro help?

Absolutely. Ticket Toro specializes in defending Florida traffic citations with a 97% success rate. Upload a photo of your ticket for a free 60-second analysis, and our attorneys will build your defense — including citing the DeLuca ruling where applicable.

What do the cluster colors on the map mean?

Blue clusters indicate 1–20 citations in that area, orange clusters indicate 21–50, and red clusters indicate 50+. Click any cluster to zoom in and see individual citation markers.

Received a red light camera ticket under F.S. 316.0083? Our Miami traffic ticket lawyers have successfully challenged these citations — and a Broward County judge has now ruled the entire system unconstitutional. We defend all violation types across all 53 Miami-Dade areas. Learn more about red light camera ticket costs and defenses or see why a judge ruled the law unconstitutional.

Related Resources

Use our data alongside these guides and tools to understand your rights and build the strongest possible defense.

Got a Red Light Camera Ticket?

Upload a photo of your citation for a free 60-second analysis. Our attorneys have a 97% success rate defending Florida traffic tickets.